Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-06

State Of M.P vs Dayanand Dohar

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 754
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P
Respondent
Dayanand Dohar
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh High Court's reduction of the sentence under Section 376 IPC and Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was illegal as it failed to provide adequate and special reasons for deviating from the minimum sentence prescribed by law. The Court emphasized the necessity for appellate courts to thoroughly consider evidence and apply their minds to the case, as mandated by Sections 384, 385, and 386 of the Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court reinstated the original sentence imposed by the trial court, finding the High Court's judgment to be cryptic and lacking in legal reasoning.

State Of M.P vs Dayanand Dohar · Niyam