Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-24

State Of M.P vs Ram Kumar

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 643
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P
Respondent
Ram Kumar
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's reduction of the sentence under Section 307 IPC to 2-1/2 months was inadequate and unsatisfactory, as it failed to consider the evidence presented during the trial. The Court emphasized the mandatory duty of the appellate court to examine the testimony of eye-witnesses and the records of the case as per Sections 384, 385, and 386 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and restored the original sentence imposed by the trial court, reinforcing the importance of thorough judicial review in criminal appeals.

State Of M.P vs Ram Kumar · Niyam