Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-20

State Of M.P vs Veerendra Singh & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 572
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P
Respondent
Veerendra Singh & Anr
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the Madhya Pradesh High Court's reduction of the sentence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC was illegal as it failed to provide adequate and special reasons for deviating from the minimum prescribed sentence of 10 years. The Court emphasized that the High Court's judgment was cryptic and showed a lack of consideration for the evidence presented. Consequently, the Supreme Court restored the original sentence of 10 years R.I. imposed by the trial court, finding the High Court's decision contrary to the express provisions of law.

State Of M.P vs Veerendra Singh & Anr · Niyam