Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-27

Sudhir G. Angur And Ors vs M. Sanjeev And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 351
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sudhir G. Angur And Ors
Respondent
M. Sanjeev And Ors
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S.N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Karnataka High Court's decision regarding the maintainability of a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, despite the Appellants' claim that the Mysore Religious and Charitable Institutions Act, 1927 barred the suit under Section 40. The Court noted that the Mysore Act had been repealed in 2003, rendering the Appellants' argument moot, as any rejection of the Plaint would only lead to its resubmission to the same court without limitation issues. The Court emphasized that the Mysore Act was a complete code, but the trial court's dismissal of the Appellants' application was justified as the matter could still be adjudicated under the CPC.

Sudhir G. Angur And Ors vs M. Sanjeev And Ors · Niyam