Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-25

Surendranagar District Panchayat vs Dahyabhai Amarsinh

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 110
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Surendranagar District Panchayat
Respondent
Dahyabhai Amarsinh
Author
P.P. Naolekar
Bench
S.N. Variava, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the reinstatement of the respondent under the Industrial Disputes Act, specifically citing Sections 25F, 25G, and 25H, which mandate compliance with procedural requirements before termination. The Court found that the Labour Court correctly inferred from the non-production of muster rolls and salary registers that the respondent had worked for more than 240 days, thus making the termination illegal. The appeal by the appellant was dismissed, affirming the lower court's decision.

Surendranagar District Panchayat vs Dahyabhai Amarsinh · Niyam