Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-10-06

State Of M.P vs Sheshrao

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 4417
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of M.P
Respondent
Sheshrao
Author
G. P. Mathur
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's reduction of the sentence under Section 376(2)(g) IPC was illegal as it failed to provide adequate and special reasons for deviating from the minimum prescribed sentence of 10 years. The Court emphasized that the High Court's judgment was cryptic and exhibited a lack of consideration for the evidence presented, violating the procedural requirements under Sections 384, 385, and 386 of the Cr.P.C. Consequently, the Supreme Court restored the original sentence imposed by the trial court, emphasizing the need for adherence to statutory sentencing guidelines.

State Of M.P vs Sheshrao · Niyam