Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-11-21

RAJINDER SINGH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA .

Citation / case number
SC 2002/13247
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAJINDER SINGH CHAUHAN
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA .
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
R.V. RAVEENDRAN ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment, affirming that Section 25-N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was not applicable to the retrenchment of employees from the Haryana State Federation of Consumers Co-operative Wholesales Stores Limited. The Court clarified that the retrenchment was conducted in accordance with Section 25-F, which outlines the conditions precedent to retrenchment, and that the appellants were not entitled to benefits under Rule 35(b) of the CONFED Staff Service Rules, 1975. The Court dismissed the appeal, confirming the legality of the retrenchment process followed by the employer.

RAJINDER SINGH CHAUHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA . · Niyam