Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-11-24

VISHNU @ UNDRYA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Citation / case number
SC 1999/8834
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VISHNU @ UNDRYA
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Author
H.K.SEMA
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE H.K. SEMA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 376 and Section 366 IPC for the crime of rape, affirming the High Court's enhancement of the sentence to five years rigorous imprisonment. The Court emphasized the importance of the prosecutrix's testimony and the corroborative evidence provided by medical reports and witness statements. The judgment reinforced the principle that consent obtained under threat is not valid, thereby affirming the legal standards for establishing rape under Indian law.

VISHNU @ UNDRYA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA · Niyam