Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-11-17

Punjab State Electricity Board vs Darbara Singh

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 387
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Punjab State Electricity Board
Respondent
Darbara Singh
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, R.V. Raveendran

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 were not applicable as the respondent's appointment was for a fixed period, falling under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Act. The Court found the High Court's judgment unsustainable, emphasizing that the respondent's work was not continuous and thus did not constitute retrenchment. The appeal by the Punjab State Electricity Board was allowed, overturning the reinstatement order of the Labour Court.

Punjab State Electricity Board vs Darbara Singh · Niyam