Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-11-08

Ajai Agarwal & Ors vs Har Govind Prasad Singhal & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 282
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ajai Agarwal & Ors
Respondent
Har Govind Prasad Singhal & Ors
Author
Altamas Kabir
Bench
Ashok Bhan, Altamas Kabir

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 16(10) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, any enhancement of rent must be supported by a written agreement, and oral agreements for such enhancement are not valid. The Court found that the landlord's claim for increased rent was not substantiated by any written documentation, thus ruling in favor of the tenant's heirs. The appeal was allowed, and the earlier judgments of the lower courts were set aside, reinforcing the necessity of written agreements for rent enhancements.

Ajai Agarwal & Ors vs Har Govind Prasad Singhal & Ors · Niyam