Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-04

VASANTHI vs STATE OF A.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/22407
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VASANTHI
Respondent
STATE OF A.P.
Author
P.P. NAOLEKAR P. VENKATARAMA REDDI
Bench
P.P. NAOLEKAR P. VENKATARAMA REDDI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the bail application of the appellant charged under Section 120-B read with Sections 364(A), 341 IPC and Section 3(4) of The Andhra Pradesh Control of Organized Crime Act, 2001. The Court emphasized that confessional statements made to police officers not authorized under Section 18(1) of the Act are inadmissible, and the prosecution's reliance on such statements was insufficient to deny bail. The Court held that the High Court's refusal to grant bail was not justified, as the evidence did not establish reasonable grounds for believing the appellant was guilty or likely to commit further offenses while on bail, thus granting bail to the appellant.

VASANTHI vs STATE OF A.P. · Niyam