Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-03

E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD. vs ASST.COMNR. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,CHENNAI

Citation / case number
SC 2001/20868
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD.
Respondent
ASST.COMNR. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,CHENNAI
Author
S. N. VARIAVA,AR. LAKSHMANAN,S. H. KAPADIA
Bench
S. N. VARIAVA,DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,S. H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, specifically Section 13 regarding advance tax payments. The Court held that the additional price for sugarcane, as per Clause 5-A of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, is to be determined at the end of the sugar year, and thus, the advance tax must reflect actual turnover. The judgment clarified the obligations of sugar manufacturers in relation to statutory pricing and tax payments, affirming the High Court's decision.

E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA) LTD. vs ASST.COMNR. OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,CHENNAI · Niyam