Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-05

M. RAMAKRISHNAN vs HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN.LTD., T.N.

Citation / case number
SC 1999/3791
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. RAMAKRISHNAN
Respondent
HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN.LTD., T.N.
Author
B.P. SINGH
Bench
B.P. SINGH & ARUN KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order of the High Court directing the respondent to deposit rent at specified rates during the pendency of a Second Appeal. The Court held that it would not interfere with the High Court's discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, emphasizing that the dismissal does not preclude the appellant from seeking a higher rent in the future. The Court refrained from commenting on the merits of the appellant's claim, leaving it open for the High Court to decide accordingly.

M. RAMAKRISHNAN vs HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPN.LTD., T.N. · Niyam