Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-03

Pramod Kumar Jaiswal And Others vs Bibi Husn Bano And Others

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2857
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Pramod Kumar Jaiswal And Others
Respondent
Bibi Husn Bano And Others
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
R.C. Lahoti

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the implications of Section 109 of the Transfer of Property Act and the doctrine of merger in the context of tenancy and ownership. The Court criticized the earlier decision in Indra Perfumery v. Moti Lal & Ors. (1969) for failing to consider these legal principles, which led to potentially anomalous consequences in landlord-tenant relationships. The Court emphasized that upon purchasing the entire interest in the property, the sub-tenant steps into the shoes of the owner, thereby altering the dynamics of eviction and tenancy rights.

Pramod Kumar Jaiswal And Others vs Bibi Husn Bano And Others · Niyam