Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-05

M. Ramakrishnan vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn.Ltd., T.N

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2652
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M. Ramakrishnan
Respondent
Hindustan Petroleum Corpn.Ltd., T.N
Author
B.P. Singh
Bench
B.P. Singh, Arun Kumar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's interim order directing the respondent to deposit rent at specified rates during the pendency of a Second Appeal, emphasizing the discretion under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Court clarified that the dismissal of the appeal does not preclude the appellant from seeking a higher rent in the future. The ruling reinforces the principle that interim orders can be modified based on the merits of the case at final disposal.

M. Ramakrishnan vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn.Ltd., T.N · Niyam