Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-05-03

E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd vs Asst. Commissioner Of Commercial ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2645
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd
Respondent
Asst. Commissioner Of Commercial ...
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S. N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S. H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 and the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, holding that the additional price for sugarcane, as per Clause 5-A of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, is to be determined at the end of the sugar year. The Court clarified that the advance payment of tax under Section 13(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act can be based on actual turnover, and emphasized the importance of timely returns for tax assessment. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision.

E.I.D. Parry (India) Ltd vs Asst. Commissioner Of Commercial ... · Niyam