State Of Haryana And Anr vs National Consumer Awareness Group And ...

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 16(1)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, emphasizing that the appointment of the President of the State Commission requires statutory consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court. The Court held that this consultation is mandatory and not merely advisory, thereby ensuring judicial oversight in the appointment process. The judgment clarifies the procedural requirements for appointments to the State Commission, reinforcing the importance of judicial input in consumer protection mechanisms.