Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-03-02

Tata Iron And Steel Co. Ltd., Bihar vs Collector Of Central Excise, Patna

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2005 SC 1092
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Tata Iron And Steel Co. Ltd., Bihar
Respondent
Collector Of Central Excise, Patna
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed three appeals under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944 concerning the applicability of Notification No. 281/86 for parts of loco wagons and rolling stock. The Court held that the benefit of the Notification was not available as the parts were not related to machinery installed in the factory, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities. Additionally, the Court ruled that the show cause notices were issued within the prescribed period of limitation under Rule 196, thus upholding the imposition of central excise duty and penalties.

Tata Iron And Steel Co. Ltd., Bihar vs Collector Of Central Excise, Patna · Niyam