Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-03-17

The District Collector,Ananthapur & ... vs V. Laxmanna

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 2802
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The District Collector,Ananthapur & ...
Respondent
V. Laxmanna
Bench
N. Santosh Hegde, S.B. Sinha

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing the detention order solely on the basis of stale instances, affirming that if the facts presented to the detaining authority are proximate, earlier incidents cannot be deemed stale. The Court emphasized that under the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug-offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986, the detaining authority must provide material indicating that the arrack sold is dangerous to public health for effective representation by the detenu. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order was set aside, reinforcing the need for proper grounds in detention matters.

The District Collector,Ananthapur & ... vs V. Laxmanna · Niyam