Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-03-09

Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1897
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise And ...
Bench
Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, affirming the Assistant Collector's ruling that the appellant's claim for rebate under Notification No. 257/76 was time-barred under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court clarified that the appellant was not entitled to the claimed rebate amount as it was based on incorrect calculations of excess sugar sold as levy and free sale sugar. The Court ruled that the amount collected from customers had already been charged as duty, thus the appellant's claim was invalid and the amount was rightly transferred to the Consumer Welfare Fund.

Sahakari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise And ... · Niyam