Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-03-11

Bolin Chetia vs Jogadish Bhuyan & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1872
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bolin Chetia
Respondent
Jogadish Bhuyan & Ors
Author
R.C. Lahoti
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled on the procedural aspects of appeals under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, clarifying that an appeal does not automatically necessitate notice to the respondent before the merits are considered. The Court emphasized its authority to summarily dismiss appeals deemed worthless without routine notice. The holding established that the admission of an appeal is subject to judicial discretion rather than an automatic process, thereby affirming the Court's power to manage its docket effectively.

Bolin Chetia vs Jogadish Bhuyan & Ors · Niyam