Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-03-16

Union Of India vs Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1832
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Union Of India
Respondent
Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors
Author
P.P. Naolekar
Bench
R.C. Lahoti, G.P. Mathur, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of the effective date of receipt of an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It clarified that the limitation period for setting aside an arbitral award begins from the date the party receives the award, as stipulated in sub-section (3) of Section 34. The Court upheld the High Court's decision that the application for setting aside the award was barred by limitation, as it was filed beyond the permissible period, thus affirming the rejection of the application for condonation of delay.

Union Of India vs Tecco Trichy Engineers & Contractors · Niyam