Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-07-21

M.L. BINJOLKAR vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2002/12955
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.L. BINJOLKAR
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
H.K. SEMA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the compulsory retirement of employees by the State of Madhya Pradesh, which were initially set aside by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal due to improper constitution of the Screening Committee and non-application of mind. The Tribunal's reinstatement orders were partially upheld by the High Court, which allowed fresh consideration of some cases. The Supreme Court found that since the employees had already retired, further examination of the High Court's decision was rendered academic, and thus, the appeals were dismissed without further orders.

M.L. BINJOLKAR vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam