FATIMA RISWANA vs STATE REP. BY A.C.P., CHENNAI .

The Supreme Court addressed the procedural rights of accused persons in a trial involving serious charges under multiple statutes, including Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 120(B), 506(ii), 366, 306, and 376 IPC. The Court upheld the Madras High Court's decision to allow the accused to peruse evidence (74 Compact Discs) in a controlled environment, emphasizing the need to prevent illegal circulation of material. The Court noted the potential embarrassment for the lady judge presiding over the case and suggested the option of transferring the case if necessary, thereby balancing the rights of the accused with the integrity of the judicial process.