Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-01-07

MOHD. SHAMIM vs NAHID BEGUM &ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/6277
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MOHD. SHAMIM
Respondent
NAHID BEGUM &ANR.
Author
S.B. SINHA N.S. HEGDE
Bench
S.B. SINHA N.S. HEGDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a settlement agreement between the parties in a case involving FIR No. 224 of 2002 under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC. The Court held that the settlement, which included a payment of Rs. 2,75,000 to the complainant in full and final settlement of all claims, was valid and enforceable. The Court emphasized that the complainant's affidavit confirmed her voluntary participation in the settlement and her lack of objection to quashing the FIR, thereby allowing the quashing of the FIR based on the mutual agreement.

MOHD. SHAMIM vs NAHID BEGUM &ANR. · Niyam