Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-01-31

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs D.P. SANDU BROS CHEMBUR (P) LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2001/19870
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI
Respondent
D.P. SANDU BROS CHEMBUR (P) LTD.
Author
RUMA PAL
Bench
RUMA PAL,ARIJIT PASAYAT,C.K. THAKKER

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether the amount received for surrendering tenancy rights is subject to capital gains tax under Section 45 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the surrender of tenancy rights constitutes a transfer of a capital asset, and thus, the amount received is a capital receipt. However, it affirmed the Tribunal's decision that capital gains could not be computed due to the inability to ascertain the cost of acquisition, leading to the conclusion that the amount was not exigible to tax under capital gains but could potentially be taxed as income from other sources under Section 10(3) and Section 56.

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs D.P. SANDU BROS CHEMBUR (P) LTD. · Niyam