Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-09

COMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYD. vs SUNDER STEELS LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 1999/16702
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYD.
Respondent
SUNDER STEELS LTD.
Author
S.N. VARIAVA,AR. LAKSHMANAN,S.H. KAPADIA
Bench
S.N. VARIAVA,DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,S.H. KAPADIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the applicability of Notification No. 30/97-C.E. under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, determining that the Respondents, an integrated steel plant, were entitled to the notification's benefits despite producing 96% of their ingots from externally sourced sponge iron. The Court held that the notification does not mandate that 100% of production must originate from iron ore processed on-site, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the Respondents met the necessary conditions for the notification's application. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's ruling.

COMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYD. vs SUNDER STEELS LTD. · Niyam