Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-14

Adil Jamshed Frenchman (D) By Lrs vs Sardar Dastur Schools Trust & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 996
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Adil Jamshed Frenchman (D) By Lrs
Respondent
Sardar Dastur Schools Trust & Ors
Author
P.P. Naolekar
Bench
Chief Justice, G.P. Mathur, P.P. Naolekar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application for additional evidence under Rule 27 of Order 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in a landlord-tenant dispute under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses Rates Control Act, 1947. The Court held that the tenant failed to demonstrate that the documents sought were not available despite due diligence, thus affirming the High Court's decision to set aside the first appellate court's order allowing additional evidence. The Court confirmed the trial court's decree based on the landlord's bona fide requirement for the premises under Section 13 of the Act, upholding the eviction order.

Adil Jamshed Frenchman (D) By Lrs vs Sardar Dastur Schools Trust & Ors · Niyam