Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-22

W.P.I.L. Ltd., Ghaziabad vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1321
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
W.P.I.L. Ltd., Ghaziabad
Respondent
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Bench
Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of excise duty exemption under Notification No. 46/94 and its subsequent amendment by Notification No. 95/94. The Court held that the amendment was clarificatory and retrospective, thus exempting parts of power driven pumps used in manufacturing from excise duty from March 1, 1994. The Court ruled that the appellant was not liable to pay excise duty for the period in question, as the omission in the original notification was an inadvertent error that was rectified by the later notification.

W.P.I.L. Ltd., Ghaziabad vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... · Niyam