Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-22

Comm.Of Central Excise, Allahabad, Etc vs M/S Hindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd., ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1312
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Comm.Of Central Excise, Allahabad, Etc
Respondent
M/S Hindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd., ...
Author
S. N. Variava
Bench
S. N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S. H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 4(4)(d)(i) of the Central Excise Act, the cost of packing, including wooden crates used for glass sheets, must be included in the assessable value unless the packing is durable and returnable. The Court affirmed the principle established in Union of India vs. Bombay Tyre International Ltd. regarding the inclusion of packing costs, emphasizing that the term 'packing' encompasses all types of wrappers and containers. The judgment upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal favoring the respondents, thereby clarifying the valuation of excisable goods for duty purposes.

Comm.Of Central Excise, Allahabad, Etc vs M/S Hindustan Safety Glass Works Ltd., ... · Niyam