Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-09

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs Sunder Steels Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1307
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Respondent
Sunder Steels Ltd
Bench
S.N. Variava, Ar. Lakshmanan, S.H. Kapadia

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Notification No. 30/97-C.E. under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, determining that an integrated steel plant is entitled to benefits even if not 100% of the ingots or billets are produced from iron ore within the same premises. The Court held that the conditions for eligibility are met if at least a portion of production (4% in this case) satisfies the criteria, rejecting the Revenue's argument that reliance on externally sourced sponge iron negates eligibility. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, affirming the Respondents' entitlement to the notification's benefits.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs Sunder Steels Ltd · Niyam