Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-16

Suresh vs Mahadevappa Shivappa Danannava And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 1047
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Suresh
Respondent
Mahadevappa Shivappa Danannava And Anr
Author
Ar. Lakshmanan
Bench
Ashok Bhan, Ar. Lakshmanan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's criminal revision petition under Section 401 of the Cr.P.C., affirming the lower court's cognizance of offences under Sections 196, 209, 386, 403, 406, and 420 IPC. The Court emphasized that the execution of the agreement to sell and the receipt of advance payment were disputed facts, which warranted a trial. The judgment reinforced the principle that allegations of fraud and breach of contract necessitate thorough examination in a criminal context.

Suresh vs Mahadevappa Shivappa Danannava And Anr · Niyam