Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-02-23

Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Ratan Melting And Wire Industries, ...

Citation / case number
(2005) 2 SCJ 333
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise
Respondent
Ratan Melting And Wire Industries, ...
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the law laid down by this Court is binding on all courts and tribunals, and circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs cannot prevail over Supreme Court judgments. The Court clarified that in cases where benefits of exemption notifications have been granted, the Revenue is bound not to reopen those cases. However, in ongoing disputes, courts must adhere to the Supreme Court's interpretation as established in Collector of Central Excise, Vadodra v. Dhiren Chemical Industries, [2002] 2 SCC 127. The matter was referred to a larger bench for further clarification.

Commissioner Of Central Excise vs Ratan Melting And Wire Industries, ... · Niyam