Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-07

STATE OF ORISSA vs SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO

Citation / case number
SC 2002/18073
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF ORISSA
Respondent
SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
TARUN CHATTERJEE ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of FIRs filed against respondents Saroj Kumar Sahoo and Nalinikanta Muduli for alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 468, and 471 IPC, along with Section 13(2) and 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court clarified that the High Court's quashing of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was inappropriate as the allegations involved serious criminal offences and the investigation was still ongoing. The Court emphasized that the High Court should not have interfered at this stage, thereby allowing the appeals and reinstating the FIRs.

STATE OF ORISSA vs SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO · Niyam