Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-16

SIDDHARTHA TUBES LTD. vs COMNR.OF CUTSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE,.M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2000/11890
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SIDDHARTHA TUBES LTD.
Respondent
COMNR.OF CUTSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE,.M.P.
Author
KAPADIA
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA ASHOK BHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether galvanization of m.s. pipes constitutes a manufacturing process under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court held that galvanization does not amount to manufacture as the pipes were already marketable after hydro testing and other processes in the tube mill section. Consequently, the value addition from galvanization should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty purposes, ruling in favor of the appellant.

SIDDHARTHA TUBES LTD. vs COMNR.OF CUTSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE,.M.P. · Niyam