Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-07

State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2005 SC 1019
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of Orissa And Anr
Respondent
Saroj Kumar Sahoo
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the High Court's orders quashing FIRs against respondents Saroj Kumar Sahoo and Nalinikanta Muduli, which were based on allegations of fraud and corruption under Sections 120B, 420, 468, and 471 IPC, and Section 13(2) and 13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court emphasized that the High Court's exercise of power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was justified as the allegations did not disclose any cognizable offence. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the High Court's decisions.

State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo · Niyam