Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-16

M/S. Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 693
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd
Respondent
Union Of India And Anr
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the appellant, engaged in manufacturing Hydrochloric Acid, was not entitled to Modvat credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for Naphthalene, as a notification dated 1st March 1986 explicitly disallowed such credit for inputs under Chapter Heading 27 of the Tariff Act. The Court held that the provisions of Rule 56A and Rule 57A must be interpreted in light of the notifications issued, and since the credit was not allowable under Rule 57A, the show-cause notice and proposed penalty under Rule 173Q were justified. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities' decisions.

M/S. Shree Hari Chemicals Export Ltd vs Union Of India And Anr · Niyam