Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-08

U.P. State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. & Anr vs Udai Narain Pandey

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 586
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
U.P. State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. & Anr
Respondent
Udai Narain Pandey
Author
S.B. Sinha
Bench
S.B. Sinha, P.K. Balasubramanyan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the termination of a workman under Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which is equivalent to Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, requires adherence to specific procedural safeguards. The Court upheld the Labour Court's decision to reinstate the workman and grant back wages, emphasizing that the workman had worked for more than 240 days in the relevant period, thus qualifying for protection under the Act. The appeal by the employer was dismissed, affirming the lower court's findings.

U.P. State Brassware Corpn. Ltd. & Anr vs Udai Narain Pandey · Niyam