Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-08

Administrator, Kamala Nehru Memorial ... vs Vinod Kumar

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 584
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Administrator, Kamala Nehru Memorial ...
Respondent
Vinod Kumar
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, Tarun Chatterjee

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Allahabad High Court's decision that the termination of the respondent's services was contrary to Section 6(N) of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the respondent had established his claim of continuous service for 240 days within a calendar year. The Court clarified that the definition of 'continuous service' under Section 2(g) of the U.P. Act was applicable, and the Labour Court's finding of insufficient continuous service was erroneous. The Court directed reinstatement with continuity of service and 50% back wages from the date of termination.

Administrator, Kamala Nehru Memorial ... vs Vinod Kumar · Niyam