Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-12-07

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut vs M/S. Maharshi Ayurveda Corporation ...

Citation / case number
AIR 2006 SUPREME COURT 557
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut
Respondent
M/S. Maharshi Ayurveda Corporation ...
Bench
Ashok Bhan, C.K. Thakker

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court, while adjudicating Civil Appeal No. 6774/2001, held that the product 'Herbonic' tonic is classifiable under Chapter heading 2001.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1944, rather than under Chapter heading 2108.90. The Court emphasized the application of Rule 3(a) of the rules of interpretation, which prioritizes specific descriptions over general ones. Consequently, the Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that the classification under 2001.90 was appropriate and set aside the orders of the lower authorities.

Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut vs M/S. Maharshi Ayurveda Corporation ... · Niyam