Tara Chand Jain vs Sir Ganga Ram Hospital And Anr

The Supreme Court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's decision, affirming that the appellant failed to establish medical negligence under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court noted that the appellant's claim for compensation of Rs. 40,00,000 was based on a lack of evidence demonstrating that the continuous urine flow was due to negligence during the prostate operation. The Court emphasized the necessity of proving deficiency in service, which was not satisfactorily demonstrated in this case.