Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-05

KISHUN @ RAM KISHUN (DEAD) THRU LRS. vs BIHARI (D) BY LRS.

Citation / case number
SC 2003/25908
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KISHUN @ RAM KISHUN (DEAD) THRU LRS.
Respondent
BIHARI (D) BY LRS.
Author
R.C. LAHOTI,C.K. THAKKER,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN
Bench
CJI R.C. LAHOTI,C.K. THAKKER,P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing that a valid compromise must be established by all parties involved. The Court held that since one party denied the existence of a compromise, the trial court's rejection of the application was justified. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's decision that there was no lawful compromise between the parties.

KISHUN @ RAM KISHUN (DEAD) THRU LRS. vs BIHARI (D) BY LRS. · Niyam