NARNE RAMA MURTHY vs RAVULA SOMASUNDARAM .

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions against the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgments, affirming that the Agreement to Sell was validly executed on behalf of all parties involved. The Court held that the question of limitation was a mixed question of fact and law, and since the possession was established to be on behalf of all, adverse possession could not be claimed. The Court found no merit in the claims regarding non-appreciation of evidence or lack of consideration, thus upholding the lower courts' decisions.