Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-29

POPAT & KOTECHA PROPERTY vs STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATION

Citation / case number
SC 2000/7538
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
POPAT & KOTECHA PROPERTY
Respondent
STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATION
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
H.K. SEMA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, on the grounds that the suit was barred by limitation. The Court noted that the appellant's claim for specific performance of the Development Agreement dated 19th January, 1983 was filed in July 1990, well beyond the limitation period. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory limitation periods in civil suits, affirming the lower court's ruling.

POPAT & KOTECHA PROPERTY vs STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATION · Niyam