Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-08

BINNY LTD vs V. SADASIVAN

Citation / case number
SC 1997/21746
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BINNY LTD
Respondent
V. SADASIVAN
Author
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
Bench
P. VENKATARAMA REDDI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of Clause 8 of an agreement under which the appellant company terminated the services of its management staff, holding that such termination was illegal and violated Section 23 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872, and Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that the respondents, despite being designated as management staff, were performing duties akin to workmen and thus entitled to protection under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically Sections 25F and 25N. The Court ruled in favor of the respondents, directing their reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

BINNY LTD vs V. SADASIVAN · Niyam