Narne Rama Murthy vs Ravula Somasundaram & Ors

The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions against the Andhra Pradesh High Court's judgments, affirming that the Petitioner entered into the Agreement to Sell on behalf of all parties involved and that possession was also taken on behalf of all. The Court held that the question of limitation was a mixed question of fact and law, and since the purchase and possession were found to be collective, the suit was not barred by limitation. The Court found no merit in the claims regarding lack of consideration or misinterpretation of evidence, thus upholding the lower courts' decisions.