Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-03

Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & ... vs R.K. Shewaramani

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3806
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & ...
Respondent
R.K. Shewaramani
Author
Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Arijit Pasayat, H. K. Sema

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court's decision that the termination of the respondent-employee's services was illegal under Rule 30A of the Industrial Drugs and Pharmaceutical Ltd. Conduct Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978. The Court found that the High Court correctly determined that the amended Rule 30A could not be applied as two departmental proceedings were already pending, and the termination lacked bona fides. The Court affirmed the High Court's ruling, allowing the employer to continue with the pending departmental proceedings against the respondent.

Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & ... vs R.K. Shewaramani · Niyam