Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-12

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd vs M/S Aksh Optifibre Ltd., & Anr

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3766
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd
Respondent
M/S Aksh Optifibre Ltd., & Anr
Author
D. M. Dharmadhikari
Bench
D. M. Dharmadhikari

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the scope of judicial authority under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing that a court must provide a reasoned order when refusing to make a reference based on the nullity or inoperativeness of an arbitration agreement. The Court held that a prima facie examination is necessary, and if the request for reference is rejected, the parties must be allowed to present evidence. The matter was remitted to the original court for a fresh decision, aligning with the opinion of Justice Srikrishna.

Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd vs M/S Aksh Optifibre Ltd., & Anr · Niyam