Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-08-08

Binny Ltd. & Anr vs V. Sadasivan & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2005 SUPREME COURT 3202
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Binny Ltd. & Anr
Respondent
V. Sadasivan & Ors
Author
K.G. Balakrishnan
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Venkatarama Reddi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that Clause 8 of the agreement between the respondents and the appellant company was void under Section 23 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872, as it violated the principles of public policy. The Court ruled that the respondents, despite being designated as management staff, were entitled to protections under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, specifically Sections 25F and 25N, and that their termination was illegal. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision to reinstate the respondents with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

Binny Ltd. & Anr vs V. Sadasivan & Ors · Niyam