Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2005

Supreme Court of India · 2005-04-19

OM PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF M.P.

Citation / case number
SC 2004/4323
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
OM PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent
STATE OF M.P.
Author
ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bench
S.H. KAPADIA ARIJIT PASAYAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and the Madhya Pradesh High Court regarding the seniority dispute between the appellant and Ram Rao Bhosley. The Court affirmed that seniority is determined by the date an employee passes the departmental examination, as established in M.P. Chandoria v. State of M.P. (1996) and State of M.P. v. Ramkinkar Gupta (2000). The appellant's claim was rejected as he did not pass the examination until after his probation period, thus confirming his placement in the seniority list was lawful.

OM PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA vs STATE OF M.P. · Niyam